Date : mailed on 17/01/04, managed to "ummo-sciences" the 13/02/04Recipients : Alban Nanty
Notes : In French - posted in France. Consider for the moment in "quarantine" pending the result of the events
Mr Alban Nanty
My name is NABGAA 112 daughter of DORIO 34. I currently reside in Belgium and expense of my brother AYIOA 1 son ADAA 67-chief of the expeditionary Western Europe except Great Britain, Ireland, Portugal and Spain.
We follow with interest the discussions of your brothers on the compilation of e-mail messages that you exchange publicly between you about our civilisation OUMMO. We would like to sometimes answer some of your queries and are aware of have resulted in a sense of frustration by restricting information voluntarily disclosed in our correspondence with you. Please be aware that we have deliberately omitted some information that you will need you own to deduct it. Your scientific development, you can already and we are seeing, smiling, " you touch some of the answers without submitting them to an attempt of objective validation.
The interest in logic tétravalente is meritorious and it is actually a way of research for which you can build on the theoretical developments made by your thinkers in recent decades. The enigma that seems to be for you our term AÏOOYAOU is caused by the indication given in our reports to your brothers and sisters that this term has no translation in meaning simple in your language. It is understood that this term is not used by us for common way, except by our specialists in OOLGA WOU-OUA WAAM (space physics theoretical), comparable to your astrophysicists land. We use it sometimes in philosophical issues concerning, for example, the purpose of the (moral laws) in the process of conformation of our BOUAWA (soul) after the disappearance of our OEMII (body).
To approach the meaning of this term, you must return to the amazing phenomenon relative to the nebulae rings IAGGIAAYAOO, already mentioned to your brothers and sisters in the past. A sudden drop in the temperature of the gas in these nebulae we can predict future deformations or folds in the structure tétradimensionnelle local of our WAAM (universe) due to the interaction with our anti-universe OUWAAM. This phenomenon occurs before the apparent cause that is at the origin actually occurred. It should be understood here that the result measurable distortion - the sudden drop of the temperature of the gas above apparently the distortion itself and not the module in any way its appearance. You would know to interpret this phenomenon, metaphorically, like a shadow that would project the wave caused in our WAAM by the clouds of matter from imagination present in OUWAAM. This shade would be as well a reflection of the phenomenon AÏOOYAOU which the amplitude and the distance in time and space are uncertain, as it would be uncertain of using the three-dimensional shape and the distance of the object, inaccessible to the senses and instruments of measurement - from the shadow that it projected on the floor.
The analysis of the data at the time of the occurrence of this phenomenon can be used to refine the parameters of the mathematical model that we will inject into the SANMOO (computer) of each OAWOOLEA OUEWA OEM (spacecraft) designed to travel through conditions isodynamic relating to the next corrugation. However, the model is inaccurate because, if we know how to predict with an approximation to correct the amplitude of the corrugation, we do not know predict with accuracy the time at which it will start. Sometimes we have to wait several months before an expedition, prepared in a few initiates his / her trip.
Please excuse me for this digression but it seems to me necessary to introduce this term which refers to a phenomenon that is only observable by its consequences, but who himself remains partially undetermined the fact that it is outside our field of perception inevitably limited and subject to disturbance, the stochastic WAAM that modulate necessarily the information conveyed by the temporal flow. Also AÏOOYAOU is a term we use to describe the state of potential existence of sub-atomic particles subject to the indeterminacy of quantum. Thus, the state of existence AÏOOYAA is inapplicable to electrons that revolve around the atomic nuclei and which are known only perceive the effects of residual inside a envelope the spatio-temporal predictable at the level of our measurement scales. We have also claimed that the integration of the soul of your brother Sergio Vieira de Mello in your psyche, the collective will have an influence on the behavior of a number of your brothers and sisters. This influence AÏOOYAOU because of the psychosocial effects measurable will appear logically in a medium term. The barbaric act and the succession of carelessness inexcusable that are the cause of the death of this man not be qualified of rétropositifs if these psychosocial effects predictable occurs.
AÏOOYAOU can sometimes project into the axis classic AÏOOYAA / AÏOOYEEDOO (true / false) if the refresh of the phenomenon predicted happens, or when the certainty that it will not occur is reached. If it is absolutely necessary to attempt to put a meaning in linguistics of the earth on this term, AÏOOYAOU would be the state of a phenomenon unknown whose emergence is perceptible or strongly predictable, but for which several updates are possible according to various distortions inherent in the flow of time that could modulate its concretion. I fear, however, that definition absconse be a source of confusion for you.
I strongly urge you to reflect on the concept of rétropositivité introduced above, unfortunately, very often rejected by your brethren, which puts into perspective an act that could be termed negative or malicious on the moment, but the consequences of which in term - evaluated before its realisation - would largely compensate for the trauma caused at the time of this act. This notion is crucial for us, especially in the spheres of medical and educational. The notion of symmetric of rétronégativité is just as important. I would ask you also to reflect on the particular aspect of this correspondence. You don't need to take the assertions in this letter as to what they are in any logic : sentences unverifiable and of dubious origin, probably written by a hoax. No matter which of your brothers you object to the argument that you would have known to write this letter yourself, and that it contains nothing transcendent nor any objective element of identification. I advise you to keep this correspondence for yourself or destroy it if you find it too disturbing. You can, if you wish, attempt to expose the firstfruits explained in this document, to your brothers and sisters by letting them assume that the idea is yours or that it has been inspired by a friend.
Agree, Mr Alban Nanty, I affix my hand against your chest in a pledge of friendship that is respectful according to the custom in force in our world.
For OUMMOAELEWE :
NABGAA 112 daughter of DORIO 34, approved by AYIOA 1 son ADAA 67
)+(
APPENDIX : GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS WITH REGARD TO OUR FORMAL REASONING TETRAVALENT
We base our system tetravalent on the non formal acceptance of the rejection of a term and median term third party in the dialectic. In this system, which IS NOT different from that of the complementary to that IS. We accept phenomenon can both BE AND NOT BE, or NEITHER BE NOR NOT BE. It is certain that such distinctions-ontological, are rarely taken into consideration in the everyday reality. They, however, are not unknown to your thinkers and you will find the first drafts in literature platonic as well as in the founding texts of the buddhist philosophy.
A and B are two sets of realities, the ontological binding in the dialectic, this system leads them to accept the four following combinations : X1 = {X ∈ A ∩ B}, X2 = {X ∈ A ∩ B}, X3 = {X ∈ A ∩ B}, X4 = {X ∈ A ∩ B}. You need to translate here A and B "IS NOT" and " NOT B ". None of the four forms of reality is not the simple complementary of one another.
We give a simple example in the diagram below, by considering the set of fundamental colors red, yellow and blue. Yellow represents the state (A) AÏOOYAA (existence verifiable) and red state (B) AÏOOYEEDOO (unreal ; outside the framework of the audit). The color orange is composed of red and yellow, the blue color is neither yellow nor red. In this logic, the complementary AÏOOYAA is not AÏOOYEEDOO. Thus the proposal to you contradictory, "X EXISTS" and "X Does NOT EXIST" is, according to the context :
- reduced to an impasse-formal Ø : (A ∩ A) or (B ∩ B) ;
- reduced to one reality, phenomenological potential or partially indeterminate (A ∩ B). This state AÏOOYAOU is well summarized in the paradox imagined by your thinker Schrödinger, which led to the deduction of two states potential conflicting bunk due to the quantum nature of the phenomena involved in the experience ;
- extended to an existence AÏOOYA AMMIÈ (B ∩ A), unverifiable outside of a field of consciousness individual or Lie at this level the process intellectifs associated with abstract concepts, or the emotions of nature, empathetic, or compassionate, that many of your thinkers associated with the phenomena of origin purely biochemical, and that we outsource partially to the entities transcendent what are the individual soul (BOUAWA), the collective soul (BOUAWEE BIAEII) and God (WOA).
The vagueness of your linguistic expressions, obliges me here to clarify that a form of surreal, translated " Does NOT EXIST ", remains in the absolute form of existence in the AÏOODI which includes every form of existence that could be considered a form of thought in any of the WAAM-WAAM. Our cognitive capacity is limited and cannot define the absolute form of non-existence.
We accept and, in the course of our developments, philosophical or mathematical, the appearance of elements that you would of contradictory because of the possible coexistence of BEING and NON-BEING, or the refutation of the two. Thus, the development of solutions in the computer algebra necessarily cause connections to be divergent. Each of these differences must be explored until its end in order to confirm or invalidate a posteriori, and by logical deduction each channel generated by each IBOSZOO IOUBOO (point of uncertainty) of the network of opportunities as well developed. I join you as an example in the diagram opposite, without meaning of its own, including two of these points.
Your scientists are also confronted with such classes of problems after a deductive process correctly built. They do not know, for example, cut for the moment the point of uncertainty left by the theory developed by your eminent a thinker as Albert Einstein. This theory, indeed, does not allow to decide between the three classes of cosmological models that are still eligible for you : negative curvature, zero positive structure tétradimensionnelle of the WAAM. This stage was inevitably reached on OUMMO in ancient times. You say that the first solution is the only one that can explain the observations made in this WAAM would require you to a profession of faith. You must arrive at this conclusion by rejecting by overwhelming evidence the other two models, and, cutting off the point of uncertainty, and even doubt, soak up some of the fascinating properties of hyperbolic geometry to refine or redefine your cosmological model. Your scientists need to be - and this is healthy - follow to the end the intuition that the tips to explore, as a priority, one of the branches as possible to develop the theory that follows from this choice. They should not, however, raise their thought process in doctrine as the point of uncertainty upstream and that their work has not resulted in reaching a final decision on the issue.
In the course of reasoning, any connection leading to the deduction of the value of Ø is disqualified and reduced (cut off) at the level of the last IBOSZOO IOUBOO from which it was begotten. A connection resulting in a point of uncertainty already generated upstream is frozen until the generator node is reduced by elsewhere, or that other connections are reduced or frozen - giving to the problem a solution non-deterministic. The reasoning is completed when all the connections lead to a singleton (*) or indeterminacy irreducible. Thus, the algebra that we use is not deterministic : it can bring forth several conclusions are not incompatible. Each IBOSZOO IOUBOO must be confronted to empirical observations, and to try to choose a hook-deductive. Some of the work for the sole purpose of reducing a point of uncertainty through the development of the predictive model are sometimes generations of thinkers on We avoid any attempt of demonstration using the principle of reduction to the absurd. This principle, still very much in force among your scientists, makes the reasoning a blind person.
We adopt in all cases, as you, the principle of identity and / or idempotency (*) : X o X = X. The negation is replaced by the principle of complementarity : the result of the complementation () is the set of possible values minus the value complemented. X1/{X1,X2,X3, X4} = {X2,X3,X4}. Thus, in binary logic, the complementation defines the negation classic : True = False /{True, False} and symmetrically False = True/{True,False}. In the same way that you introduce the quantities in discrete and 1 in your boolean algebra we use four values of basic logic can be represented in the symbolic by {0 Λ 1, 1 Λ 0, Λ 1, 1 Λ 0}. The exploration of the graph node of a problem by the computer algebra is to obtain a reduction to one of the two tautologies among {1 Λ 1, Λ 0} that validate a solution or to one of the two impasses formal among {1 Λ 1, Λ 0} disagree, then the assumptions made at the last IBOSZOO IOUBOO.
We use, of course, in our reasoning a wide range of logical operators and causal restrictive that are necessary to constrain the combinatorial explosion caused in the course of computer algebra. The variables going into the calculation are themselves connected by relations binding specific to the problem being treated.
* NdWSingleton : in the field of mathematics, a group which does understand that a single element
Idempotency : in the domain of mathematics, refers to an element e of a set E equipped with a law of internal composition that may be noted in o, such that e o e = e (example : zero is idempotent for addition : + = 0)